Skip to main content

Hockey Puck Conservation of Momentum Blog


Conservation Of Momentum With Hockey Pucks


Link to Video: https://youtu.be/LkCw82xbROg


In this blog, the conservation of momentum can be shown using one hockey puck of 0.05 kg that has a velocity of 0 m/s while another hockey puck of 0.15 kg that has a velocity of 2.791 m/s. That number is found by plugging the video into Logger Pro and calculating the velocity just before the collision. After plugging the information into Logger Pro, the initial velocity of m1 is found to be 2.791 m/s.

Velocity Graph of V1 (Initial)



The heavier hockey puck is pushed (by my sister) in the positive x direction towards the stationary lighter puck. The final velocity of the two pucks can be calculated using the conservation of momentum equations.

m1 = 0.15 kg                            V1 (initial) = 2.791 m/s
m2 = 0.05 kg                            V2 (initial) = 0 m/s

(m1 * v1 (initial)) + (m2 * v2 (initial)) = (m1 * v1 (final)) + (m2 * v2 (final))
V1 (initial) + V1 (final) = V2 (initial) + V2 (final) --> V1F = V2F +V2I - V1I
(0.15*2.791) + (0.05*0) = (0.15*V1F) + (0.05*V2F)
V1F = V2F + 0 - 2.791

0.4186 = (0.15*(V2F + 0 - 2.791)) + (0.05*V2F) 
 0.4186 = 0.15*V2F - 0.4186 + 0.05*V2F
0.8373 = 0.20*V2F --> V2F = 0.8373/0.2 
V2F = 4.187 m/s

(0.15*2.791) + (0.05*0) = (0.15*V1F) + (0.05*4.187)
0.4186 = 0.15*V1F + 0.209 --> V1F = 0.209/0.15
V1F = 1.395 m/s

After the two pucks collide, the heavier puck is still traveling in the positive x direction with a velocity of 1.395 m/s while the lighter puck is traveling in the positive x direction as well but with a velocity of 4.187 m/s. These numbers were then checked using Logger Pro. In Logger Pro, the V1F was calculated to be 1.69 m/s immediately following the collision. The V2F was calculated to be 4.025 m/s immediately following the collision. After the collision, due to friction and air resistance and even the wind, the two pucks quickly decelerated and came to a stop. Both final velocities found in Logger Pro are very close to the numbers found by solving the equations. There is room for error from the fact that the 2.791 m/s of the V1 initial may have been slightly off which would have affected the rest of the answers. Also there could have been error when plotting the points in Logger Pro which would have made the numbers slightly different. Finally, the numbers may have been different than the ones calculated because masses calculated may have been a few decimal places off therefore making the two velocities different values.

Velocity Graph of the V1F 


Velocity Graph of the V2F





Technically, after the two pucks collide, they do not continue to travel only the x direction, but I was unable to calculate the angle that the two pucks travelled after the collision, although the angle would have been very small. Also, I tried to slide the pucks on an area that was icy so the friction factor is low but there is still friction present as well as air resistance although the air resistance would be low as well. So overall, these numbers are not exact by any means, but if air resistance, friction, and the angles are excluded, then this can be seen as a great example of conservation of momentum.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Physics of Spiderman

Over this past weekend after I finished working on my homework, I decided to relax and watch a few movies before going asleep. Among the movies I watched was Spider-Man 3 from 2007 and despite the movie flaws I was interested by the scenes that showed Spider Man shooting through the sky with the use of his webs that come out of his wrists. Due to this, I decided to make my blog post about the physics of Spider-Man's slingshot. After doing some research, I discovered just how much information there is on the physics of Spider-Man and how elements of Spider-Man can be used as examples for most topics learned in mechanics. For this investigation, I will not be using the horrible cliche and terrible CGI infested mess that Spider-Man 3 is but instead the all around superior Spider-Man movie of Spider-Man 2 to investigate the physics of Spider-Man's web propelled slingshot.  I want to talk about what happens in terms of physics when Spider-Man launches himself across a dista...
Post a Comment
Read more

Physics of Sound Dampeners and Active Noise Cancellation

Physics of Sound Dampeners and Active Noise Cancellation Sound dampening foam panels in a recording studio. ANC headphones worn by pilots and/or passengers in consumer aviation aircraft.  Acoustic treatment of soundscapes has grown alongside the sound production industry. Whether through absorption panels, diffusors and cloud panels to treat a space or headphones placed directly over the ears of listeners, acoustic treatment comes in many forms. Environments are treated acoustically to absorb excess sound to prevent sound levels from crossing a threshold above which the desired goal cannot be had. Before getting into sound dampening, we must discuss sound. Sound is produced when an object vibrates (a form of oscillation) and temporarily displaces nearby air molecules causing a wave effect as the displaced molecules collide with their neighboring molecules. Sound waves are fluctuations in pressure as the initial displacement of molecules experiences collisions that in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Physics of Black Holes...Or Lack Thereof

Isabella Jacavone To comprehend how the universe works, we must dwell into the most basic building blocks of existence; matter, energy, space, and time. NASA's  Physics of the Cosmos program involves cosmology, astrophysics, and fundamental physics intended to answer questions about the elusiveness of complex concepts such as black holes, neutron stars, dark energy, and gravitational waves. In this blog post, I'd like to elaborate on a subject that is very intriguing  to me; Black holes. And more specifically, what would happen if we got near one. A black hole is anything but a hole, but rather an immense amount of matter compacted into an extremely small area. A black hole is caused when, hypothetically, a star four times more massive than our sun collapses into a sphere no bigger than 600 square km. To put that in perspective, that's about the size of New York City. B lack holes were predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity, which showed that when a...
Post a Comment
Read more