Skip to main content

Snow Day Momentum


For the snow day blog, I decided to test two different types of inelastic collisions with snowballs.
The first video demonstrates an inelastic collision in which a snowball of 0.25kg hits a wall.
In this inelastic collision, the 0.25kg snowball travels at 1.8m/s and impacts the wall. The snowball breaks into pieces and transfers 0.45 kg*m/s to the wall which is not noticeably moved(high quality wall, cedar shingles, can't beat it).

This second video demonstrates a similar collision in which another 0.25kg snowball hits a stick and knocks the stick off of two cones.
This screenshot shows the trajectory of the snowball and stick as the kinetic energy is transferred from the former to the latter.
If we use the momentum formula of
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1f+m2v2f
we can calculate the mass of the stick that was hit based on this data and then draw conclusions about energy loss.

The data shows that the snowball being thrown had a velocity of 1.8m/s and the stick after being hit had a velocity of 0.75m/s.
0.25*1.8+0*m2=0.25*0+m2*0.75
0.45=m2*0.75
m2=0.6kg.
If this collision is assumed to have been elastic (which it was not) then the mass of the stick is estimated to be 0.6kg. This collision is not elastic as can be proven through observation- the snowball broke on impact and the majority of the snowball was distributed in pieces and only glanced off of the stick. Therefore, not all of the momentum of the snowball was transferred to the stick. This means that the stick likely weighed less than is predicted by this experiment. In practice, I found and used a stick that was approximately the same mass as the snowball to see how the inelastic nature of the collision would impact the mass calculation. 

Overall, the experiment resulted in the finding that when a collision that is not elastic but has some elastic properties is falsely interpreted as an elastic collision, data results can be skewed and will likely be inaccurate. The degree to which these calculated results are inaccurate reflects the elasticity of the collision.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Physics of Spiderman

Over this past weekend after I finished working on my homework, I decided to relax and watch a few movies before going asleep. Among the movies I watched was Spider-Man 3 from 2007 and despite the movie flaws I was interested by the scenes that showed Spider Man shooting through the sky with the use of his webs that come out of his wrists. Due to this, I decided to make my blog post about the physics of Spider-Man's slingshot. After doing some research, I discovered just how much information there is on the physics of Spider-Man and how elements of Spider-Man can be used as examples for most topics learned in mechanics. For this investigation, I will not be using the horrible cliche and terrible CGI infested mess that Spider-Man 3 is but instead the all around superior Spider-Man movie of Spider-Man 2 to investigate the physics of Spider-Man's web propelled slingshot.  I want to talk about what happens in terms of physics when Spider-Man launches himself across a dista...

Physics of Sound Dampeners and Active Noise Cancellation

Physics of Sound Dampeners and Active Noise Cancellation Sound dampening foam panels in a recording studio. ANC headphones worn by pilots and/or passengers in consumer aviation aircraft.  Acoustic treatment of soundscapes has grown alongside the sound production industry. Whether through absorption panels, diffusors and cloud panels to treat a space or headphones placed directly over the ears of listeners, acoustic treatment comes in many forms. Environments are treated acoustically to absorb excess sound to prevent sound levels from crossing a threshold above which the desired goal cannot be had. Before getting into sound dampening, we must discuss sound. Sound is produced when an object vibrates (a form of oscillation) and temporarily displaces nearby air molecules causing a wave effect as the displaced molecules collide with their neighboring molecules. Sound waves are fluctuations in pressure as the initial displacement of molecules experiences collisions that in ...

Physics of Black Holes...Or Lack Thereof

Isabella Jacavone To comprehend how the universe works, we must dwell into the most basic building blocks of existence; matter, energy, space, and time. NASA's  Physics of the Cosmos program involves cosmology, astrophysics, and fundamental physics intended to answer questions about the elusiveness of complex concepts such as black holes, neutron stars, dark energy, and gravitational waves. In this blog post, I'd like to elaborate on a subject that is very intriguing  to me; Black holes. And more specifically, what would happen if we got near one. A black hole is anything but a hole, but rather an immense amount of matter compacted into an extremely small area. A black hole is caused when, hypothetically, a star four times more massive than our sun collapses into a sphere no bigger than 600 square km. To put that in perspective, that's about the size of New York City. B lack holes were predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity, which showed that when a...