Skip to main content

Blog #3: Effect of a track's curve on running times

The sport of track and field, regardless of whether it is inside or outside, consists of three generally accepted disciplines, sprinting, distance and throwing. Sprinters in particular are attempting to go as fast as possible over short distances and due to this the shape of a track affects these athletes the most. A standard track compliant to International Association of Athletics Federations regulations will consist of a rectangle with a semi circle at each end (as seen below).  The straight-aways on a track are 84.39 meters long while the semi-circles have a radius of 36.5 meters making each semi circle have a circumference of 114.7 meters roughly equaling a distance of 400 meters. For very short sprint events like the 100 meters, the entire race is contained to one straightway making it very easy for these sprinters to hit their max speed. Put the same sprinters into a longer race like the 200 meters or 400 meters, and those sprinters run slower not just because of the longer distance but also the very shape of the track which forces them to run around a corner. While rounding the corner, a sprinter is forced to slow down due to the forces acting on them, this is why sprinters frequently complain that the inside lane is too tight
The physics behind running on the curve of a track is quite interesting as runners are producing forces which counteract the forces acting on them. The runner must produce a centriptal force to stay on the track which can be defined as Fc= -mass * speed^2/radius of turn. The speed is the tangental speed of the runner, mass is the mass of the runner and the nagative sign comes from the fact the force is directed towards the center of track. The tighter the turn the more force or less speed is neccesary to succesfully make the turn. This force is limited by the amount of friction acting between the shoe and the track's surface. The force of friction if f=μ*normal force with μ being the coefficent of friction while the runner is in contact with the rack. If the track is flat this normal force is the weight of runner and if the friction is low the runner can lose contact with the service and fly off the curve. 

 In the above picture, the turn radius is depicted as R, the centrifugal force needed to maintain a path around the track is Fc, the force neccesary to propel the runner along the track is Ft and the total force exerted by the runner on the track is F. Using an equation from my sources, f(t) -(v/τ)=dv(t)/dt, I can begin to solve how much slower a race is when it is run around a curved track. This earlier equation can be rewritten as dv(t)/dt + (v/τ) = f since f(t)=f. This equation is a straight line motion of a runner on the straight part of a track with the f point in the direction of the motion of the runner. Referring the earlier photo, it can be determined that v(t) is in the tangental direction. The right side of the equation must be replaced with ft/m as it must be applied to the tangental direction, creating dv(t)/dt + (v/τ) = Ft/m. From here the equation can be solved:

From here f/m = f and fc/m = v^2/R

Finally the equation becomes

For a 200 meter race, the starts are staggered so that every runner runs exactly 100 meters of the race on the curve. The radius of the curve of each lane is very different but by knowing that a lane is 1.22 meters wide the inner radius of any lane n would be   


The solving of this equation requires the expansion of the equation to a point I do not quite understand which can be seen in Igor Alexandrov and Philip Lucht's journal article in the American Journal of Physics. In the end, a runner in the innermost lane (lane 1) would run the 200 meters in 19.72 seconds while the runner in lane 8 would run in 19.6 seconds creating a big time difference causing almost a full meter of seperation between the two runners which is quite big at the college level and beyond. Sadly however, runners in lane 8 do not win as often as the math says as they have psychological disadvantage as they can not see the position of the other runners until the final stretch. 

Sources

Joseph B. Keller, A Theory of Competitive Running, Physics Today 26(9), 42-47 (1973). http://eaton.math.rpi.edu/CourseMaterials/Fall01/AK6600/run2.pdf

J. Strnad, Physics of Long-Distance Running, American Journal of Physics 53, 371- 373 (1985). http://aapt.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1119/1.14169

Igor Alexandrov and Philip Lucht, Physics of Sprinting, American Journal of Physics 49, 254-257 (1981). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/243489558_Physics_of_sprinting

https://healthfully.com/dimensions-running-track-8232920.html   

http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2001-05/989942384.Ph.r.html


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Physics of Black Holes...Or Lack Thereof

Isabella Jacavone To comprehend how the universe works, we must dwell into the most basic building blocks of existence; matter, energy, space, and time. NASA's  Physics of the Cosmos program involves cosmology, astrophysics, and fundamental physics intended to answer questions about the elusiveness of complex concepts such as black holes, neutron stars, dark energy, and gravitational waves. In this blog post, I'd like to elaborate on a subject that is very intriguing  to me; Black holes. And more specifically, what would happen if we got near one. A black hole is anything but a hole, but rather an immense amount of matter compacted into an extremely small area. A black hole is caused when, hypothetically, a star four times more massive than our sun collapses into a sphere no bigger than 600 square km. To put that in perspective, that's about the size of New York City. B lack holes were predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity, which showed that when a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Physics of Spiderman

Over this past weekend after I finished working on my homework, I decided to relax and watch a few movies before going asleep. Among the movies I watched was Spider-Man 3 from 2007 and despite the movie flaws I was interested by the scenes that showed Spider Man shooting through the sky with the use of his webs that come out of his wrists. Due to this, I decided to make my blog post about the physics of Spider-Man's slingshot. After doing some research, I discovered just how much information there is on the physics of Spider-Man and how elements of Spider-Man can be used as examples for most topics learned in mechanics. For this investigation, I will not be using the horrible cliche and terrible CGI infested mess that Spider-Man 3 is but instead the all around superior Spider-Man movie of Spider-Man 2 to investigate the physics of Spider-Man's web propelled slingshot.  I want to talk about what happens in terms of physics when Spider-Man launches himself across a dista...
Post a Comment
Read more

2017 Physics Nobel Prize - Capturing Gravitational Waves

 2017 Physics Nobel Prize - Capturing Gravitational Waves Gravitational Waves Captured by LIGO Who?  Rainer Weiss, Barry C. Barish, and Kip S. Thorne - LIGO/VIRGO Collarboration What?  Observation of gravitational waves for the first time using LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory. Where?  Two locations in the US - Hanford and Livingston. (See figure 1) Figure 1: LIGO in the US When?  14 September 2015 HOW?  The scientists captured gravitational waves by using an interferometer. The LIGO interferometer is a more glamorous interferometer than the original Michelson interferometer. It works through using light waves to measure gravitational interference (i.e. waves). First, one needs to understand the parts of an interferometer. The LIGO interferometer (and most) is shaped as an L. It has two 4 km vacuum tunnel arms with a mirror at each end. At the center of the arms, there is a beam splitter. Th...
Post a Comment
Read more