Skip to main content

Snow Day Blog! Medicine Ball and Volleyball Collision

Isabella Jacavone - Period E

For my Snow Day blog, I decided to test the conservation of momentum between a medicine ball that's used for working out and a basic volleyball. The medicine ball was labeled with a big white "4 kg" so I, as an observing experimenter am inclined to believe that the mass of the medicine ball is 4 kg, meanwhile I had to do some digging to find out the mass of the volleyball. I did this by looking up the approximate mass of an indoor volleyball with the dimensions and pressure of my volleyball. The mass that I found was 9.9 ounces, and using Google's help I converted the mass of the volleyball to .281 kg. 

In my experiment, I had the volleyball rest on my patio 1 meter in front of the medicine ball. While the volleyball was at rest, I gave the medicine ball a healthy push and let physics do its thing. 


Taking this video and plugging it into Logger Pro, I began plotting points from the center of the medicine ball until the end of the clip. I did the same for the volleyball. The resulting X displacement vs. time graph for both the medicine ball and the volleyball looks as such:

Finding the line of best fit for each graph, I was able to find the velocity of the medicine ball before the collision, 0.94 m/s 

Medicine Ball before the Collision:
V: 0.94 m/s
M: 4kg
p = mv
p= (4)(0.94) 
momentum = 3.76 kg m/s

Volleyball before the Collision:
V: 0 m/s
M: .281 kg 
p=mv
p=(0.281)(0)
momentum = 0 kg m/s 

Medicine Ball/Volleyball System after collision
V; 0.73 m/s
M: (m1+m2) = 4.281 kg
p=mv
p=(4.281)(0.73)
momentum= 3.125 kg m/s

As we learned in class, momentum is conserved in any collision, but energy is not. 

KEi (KE of Medicine ball) = (.5)mv^2 = (.5)(4)(0.94)^2 = 1.767 J
The volleyball had no KE because it was not moving before the collision 

KEf (KE of the system after the collision) = (.5)(m1+m2)vf^2 = (.5)(4.281)(0.73)^2 = 1.141 J

change in KE = KEi - KEf = 1.767 J - 1.141 J = 0.626 J lost in the collision, which is a 35% decrease in KE. 

In conclusion, I can evaluate that this collision was in fact an inelastic collision; energy  (specifically 35%) is lost in the collision yet momentum remains conserved. The lost energy can be transferred into sound, bounce, and any other movements of the systems. I am sure that more could be done to limit the outside factors affecting the experiment, but this simple backyard experiement does an awful good job representing the conservation of momentum in a collision and the loss of energy that results. Viva las physics!





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Physics of Black Holes...Or Lack Thereof

Isabella Jacavone To comprehend how the universe works, we must dwell into the most basic building blocks of existence; matter, energy, space, and time. NASA's  Physics of the Cosmos program involves cosmology, astrophysics, and fundamental physics intended to answer questions about the elusiveness of complex concepts such as black holes, neutron stars, dark energy, and gravitational waves. In this blog post, I'd like to elaborate on a subject that is very intriguing  to me; Black holes. And more specifically, what would happen if we got near one. A black hole is anything but a hole, but rather an immense amount of matter compacted into an extremely small area. A black hole is caused when, hypothetically, a star four times more massive than our sun collapses into a sphere no bigger than 600 square km. To put that in perspective, that's about the size of New York City. B lack holes were predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity, which showed that when a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Physics of Spiderman

Over this past weekend after I finished working on my homework, I decided to relax and watch a few movies before going asleep. Among the movies I watched was Spider-Man 3 from 2007 and despite the movie flaws I was interested by the scenes that showed Spider Man shooting through the sky with the use of his webs that come out of his wrists. Due to this, I decided to make my blog post about the physics of Spider-Man's slingshot. After doing some research, I discovered just how much information there is on the physics of Spider-Man and how elements of Spider-Man can be used as examples for most topics learned in mechanics. For this investigation, I will not be using the horrible cliche and terrible CGI infested mess that Spider-Man 3 is but instead the all around superior Spider-Man movie of Spider-Man 2 to investigate the physics of Spider-Man's web propelled slingshot.  I want to talk about what happens in terms of physics when Spider-Man launches himself across a dista...
Post a Comment
Read more

2017 Physics Nobel Prize - Capturing Gravitational Waves

 2017 Physics Nobel Prize - Capturing Gravitational Waves Gravitational Waves Captured by LIGO Who?  Rainer Weiss, Barry C. Barish, and Kip S. Thorne - LIGO/VIRGO Collarboration What?  Observation of gravitational waves for the first time using LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory. Where?  Two locations in the US - Hanford and Livingston. (See figure 1) Figure 1: LIGO in the US When?  14 September 2015 HOW?  The scientists captured gravitational waves by using an interferometer. The LIGO interferometer is a more glamorous interferometer than the original Michelson interferometer. It works through using light waves to measure gravitational interference (i.e. waves). First, one needs to understand the parts of an interferometer. The LIGO interferometer (and most) is shaped as an L. It has two 4 km vacuum tunnel arms with a mirror at each end. At the center of the arms, there is a beam splitter. Th...
Post a Comment
Read more